Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
well, it's actually relatively easy to make that (works on my machine
now) but as always .. how to interface best -)
and ... of course it takes some time to find all points where
synchronization has to take place
Hans
Understand. I appreciate if upgrading the whole context distro will
not be needed. I am afraid of something works differently - and there
is no time to fix it. So some patches/file exchanges are feasible?
actually, the patch i sent you off-list is not that dangerous because
(1) it is written on top of the untouched low level mark handler
(2) it leaves the normal marks untouched
not at all: \getmarking[A][all] does not swallow [A]
so it will end up in the distribution if you find no flaws
as usual the problem is in documenting it (i.e. when adding new things
for you others may complain that the manual is way behind -)
What does it mean \global\mofcolumns\plusone
inside of setups in your test example? Is it really needed?
I put the info to tex-show (getmarking). I reminds me there are many
items missing in the tex-show, the list is on the wiky - columnsets are
among them.
vit
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
