Zeljko Vrba wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> > We were planning on using Vim for preprocessing things like this > > instead > Vim for preprocessing? Isn't it a bit too painful compared to using a > "real" programming language? You misunderstand. Vim can easily be made to output the highlighting it would apply to a document on the display to something else, e.g., outputting TeX directives instead. A subthread on the subject can be found here: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2005/012885.html It would require very little programming. syntax/2html.vim, which converts the buffer to a HTML document with syntax highlighting, is 526 lines in the current CVS incarnation. A syntax/2context.vim would be even shorter, perhaps 150 to 200 lines. If I find the time I’ll write something this weekend. I’m catching a could though, so I might not :-(. (Note: This would thus allow highlighted code for any format Vim understand, which is currently over 450!) nikolai -- Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/! Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden. main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);} _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
