(This mail was rejected as spam in my first try, and the reject
message was catched by my spam filter...)
Am 2006-01-03 um 11:51 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
You need to expand the \Set commands in that first loop,
otherwise you store the literal token \recursevelel inside
the definitions of the Key and Val macros (\setvalue{}{}
autoexpands its first argument, but not its second argument).
When not inside a recursion, \recurselevel expands to the number
0 (zero) in the "manual bit", and you are actually re-evaluating
the macro using the then current \recurselevel definition
when inside the "looping" bit.
The magic expansion hit me again, I should've known it.
So you need:
\dostepwiserecurse{1}{9}{1}{
\expanded{\Set{\recurselevel}{K\recurselevel}{V\recurselevel}}
}
I hope this is clear enough?
Thank you very much!
Actually, in the real environment I needed the \expanded at another
place:
\def\Sender#1#2#3{\setvalue{SenderKey#1}{#2}\setvalue{SenderVal#1}{#3}}
\def\GetSenderLine#1{\bTR\bTD\doiftextelse{\getvalue{SenderKey#1}}
{\getvalue{SenderKey#1}:}{}\eTD\bTD\getvalue{SenderVal#1}\eTD\eTR}
% initialize values (not even needed)
\dostepwiserecurse{1}{9}{1}{
\Sender{\recurselevel}{}{}
}
\startsetups sendertablesetup
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[x][1][width=\senderkeywidth, align=left, style={\keystyle
\strut}]
\setupTABLE[x][2][width=\sendervalwidth, align=right, style=
{\valstyle\strut}]
\bTABLE
\dostepwiserecurse{1}{9}{1}{% count from 1 to 9, step 1
\expanded{\GetSenderLine{\recurselevel}}
}
\eTABLE
\stopsetups
I collect this (and more) at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/
Talk:Letter_style
Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://contextgarden.net
http://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
