Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>>>The definition from m-newmat is at least partly superceded by the
>>>new core math definitions Hans added last week, so a new implementation
>>>would be better.
>>
>>Can you suggest something?
>
>
> Like this maybe?
>
> \def\substack#1%
> {\begingroup
> \let\\\cr
> \startmathmatrix #1\stopmathmatrix
> \endgroup}
>
> Probably needs a bit of tweaking to make it look better
> (perhaps a [strut=no] parameter?).
What about use math primitive \atop:
\def\substack#1%
{\begingroup
\let\\\atop
#1
\endgroup}
Vit
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
