Aditya Mahajan wrote: > <--- On Mar 30, Taco Hoekwater wrote ---> > >>* The broken eq reference (at least IMO this is a bug) >> \starttext >> \placeformula[eqn1] >> \startformula \startalign[n=1] a\\ \stopalign \stopformula >> See \in[eqn1] >> \stoptext > > I am not sure that this is a bug. Infact, I am not behaviour is > expected. > \placeformula[eq1] > \startformula \startalign[n=1] > a \\ > b \\ > \stopalign \stopformula > What should \in[eqn1] refer to? The first eqn, the second, or both?
Both, perhaps. But it could as well take the first one, or the last. My rationale is: if there is a label given by the user, then referring to that should resolve into something that is a valid link. It is definately inconsistent to discard a supplied label because it's contents may be unresolvable. Taco _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
