Johannes Graumann wrote: > Hello, > > While the recent modifications to the split table mechanisms provided by > Hans help me out with my most annoying monster table using the XML mapping > code below (see > http://www.idyll.org:8081/JohSite/context/p46-50_split_working.pdf/view for > the typeset table; clearly to much whitespace, but everything is typeset > and page boundaries are honored) and several other -smaller- tables in the > same tome (see > http://www.idyll.org:8081/JohSite/context/p45_unsplit_working.pdf/view for > a typeset example), one medium-sized table that clearly should not be split > gets split none the less (see > http://www.idyll.org:8081/JohSite/context/p162-163_unnecessary_split.pdf/view) > ... > and I have no idea why. > > some of your rows are quite high and since you want to repeat headers ... this is how it works
(1) keep at least one row with a repeated header (2) the same with a repeated footer (3) when a combination of header/row/footer becomes too high for a page, ignore that fact and flush it (else we get a loop) so, what you see is pretty natural in your case, i'd try to make the last column wider so that less space gets lost and (i can think of a way to let the text continue on too empty pages; needs some braincycles) Hans _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
