Thanks, I will try the suggestions.
As for Taco's remark:
> If you really want your code to be as efficient and minimalist as
> possible, you are better of with the plain format than with ConTeXt
> in any case. Personally I prefer to optimize on complexity and
> readability of my sources instead of on machine clock cycles.
Yes, I from the old programming school (back to the sixties) and I
like simple efficient and thus a bit minimalistic, code. Not because
of the clock cycles (anymore) but because I believe the simplest code
most often is the one with the least problems.
Regarding plain format: no I like what is possible in Context and am
abhorred by the idea to have to find out all that by myself; but so
now and then I am self-willed enough to do things "my way".
On Jul 14, 2006, at 12:13, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>> \backgroundline[red]{...}
>
> As you can see, there are plenty commands even I had not heard
> about yet :-)
>
> Taco
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
met vriendelijke groet
Hans van der Meer
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
