Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Would it name sense to provide a \namedglyph macro in ConTeXt for
> XeTeX users as well? (Hopefully the feature will be available in
> pdfTeX as well ;)
>
\namedglyph is too generic; you ask for a \fontglyph\font{name} and even then,
there probably is not sucha primitive, but just a lua call which will consult
the font data so that one can also take care of missign glyphs
anyhow, such a command needs to be defined for each engine, with proper
fallbacks which is not somthing i'm gonna do as a quick hack/fix.
Now, for the moment you can use your definition which you can always (some time
in the future) map onto a context one. This way of asking for a glyph is low
level anyway.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
