On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do
> > it:
> >
> > \placeformula
> > $$
> > f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx
> > $$
> >
> > It didn't work anymore?!? It doesn't place a number nor does it do the
> > spacing
> > properly. It does work the "context" way using
> >
> > \placeformula
> > \startformula
> > f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx
> > \stopformula
>
> This is a bug in doplaceformula. I do not know how to avoid it, but
> the next code illustrates what is happening.
>
> \def\dotest{
> \def\nextnext{$}%
> \ifx\next\nextnext
> Inside dispplaceformula\ldots % This always fails
> \else
> Inside dodoplaceformula\ldots
> \fi}
>
> \def\test{\futurelet\next\dotest}
>
> \test$$A = B$$
>
> This prints "Inside dodoplaceformula" even though the next character
> is \$.
>
> So, the \next=\nextnext branch never matches. I do not know why this
> happens, but a more robust check is needed in doplaceformula.
\ifcat seems to be working, but I do not really know how robust this
is?
\unprotect
\def\doplaceformula[#1][#2]% #2 = dummy, gobbles spaces
{\def\redoplaceformula
{\bgroup
\ifx\next\bgroup
\egroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] % [ref]{}
\else
% \def\nextnext{$}%
% \ifx\next\nextnext
\ifcat\next$%
\egroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] % [ref]$$
\else
\egroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] % [ref]\start
\fi
\fi[#1]{}}%
\futurelet\next\redoplaceformula}
\long\def\moreplaceformula[#1]#2#3#4% #2 dummy #4 gobbles spaces
{\def\redoplaceformula
{\bgroup
% \def\nextnext{$}%
% \ifx\next\nextnext
\ifcat\next$%
\egroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] % [ref]$$
\else
\egroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] % [ref]\start
\fi
[#1]{#3}}%
\futurelet\next\redoplaceformula#4}
\protect
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:test] $$A = B$$
\stoptext
Aditya
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
