Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>> On 2/4/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>>>> On 2/4/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Rolf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But to my surprise ConTeXt automatically converts my RGB colors (even
>>>>>>> the MP defined ones), except that the final colors are in the CMY
>>>>>>> instead of CMYK color space. All I want is a true RGBtoCMYK conversion.
>>>>>>> I know about the calculating limitations in TeX, so I can wait for an
>>>>>>> implemetation of that macro in LuaTeX.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> but even then ... we need a formula ...
>>>>>>
>>>>> Most pages on the internet list the following simple conversion formula:
>>>>>
>>>>> C' = 1 - (R/range) C = (C' - K') / (1 - K')
>>>>> M' = 1 - (G/range) M = (M' - K') / (1 - K')
>>>>> Y' = 1 - (B/range) Y = (Y' - K') / (1 - K')
>>>>> K' = MIN(C',Y',M') K = K'
>>>>>
>>>>> In the special case of K'=1, use (0,0,0,1)
>>>>>
>>>>> (I'm not a TeX guru, but I assume that conversion with current macros
>>>>> should not be much more difficult than conversion with luaTeX.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> this is what we have now
>>>>
>>>> \def\doconvertRGBtoCMYK#1\to#2%
>>>> {\colordimen#1\points
>>>> \multiply\colordimen \plusthousand
>>>> \colorcount\colordimen
>>>> \advance\colorcount \medcard
>>>> \divide\colorcount \maxcard
>>>> \colorcount-\colorcount
>>>> \advance\colorcount \plusthousand
>>>> \edef#2{\realcolorvalue\colorcount}}
>>>>
>>>> \def\convertRGBtoCMYK#1#2#3%
>>>> {\doconvertRGBtoCMYK#1\to\@@cl@@c
>>>> \doconvertRGBtoCMYK#2\to\@@cl@@m
>>>> \doconvertRGBtoCMYK#3\to\@@cl@@y
>>>> \let\@@cl@@k\@@cl@@z}
>>>>
>>>> well, you can spent the rest of the evening writing an alternative
>>> Since writing reports can sometimes be really boring, you can test if
>>> the following works, but please don't ask me what it does ;)
>>>
>> I doubt that writing such macros is a better activity ;)
>> Thanks to you Mojca for this nice and clean structured solution.
>
> Nice and clean structured??? I hope that you're joking ... ;)
>
:))
It's working and this is more than I can say from my first attempt. But
you are right. There is much room for optimization. I'll try to cook up
something new tomorrow and then send you the result.
Calculating in TeX can be so much fun ;)
>> The conversion works ok, but the accuracy is not good enough. I have
>> translated some parts into etex (better accuracy in divisions using
>> dim|numexpr), but it's still lacks of accuracy. I will try to use a
>> special macro (blow up numerator) for all divisions.
>
> The problem with accuracy appears at more steps:
> - I used RGB->CMY->CMYK conversion, CMY is round off to 3 decimal places
> - (c-k)/(1-k) probably works disastrous for large values of k
> - (I had quite some problems understanding how conversion between
> counters and dimensions works, and even more problems to find a clean
> solution - eTeX is surely a better choice)
>
> Mojca
>
> (no ConTeXt on this computer, so I'll reply about the rest later)
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
