Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>
>> On 2/12/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A question to Hans: I do not know much about fonts, but from what I
>>> understand ec is ugly and one should use texnansi.
>>>
>> What exactly do you mean with "ugly"?
>>
>
> Did I say that I do not know about fonts :) I was just reflecting on
> what I have seen on the mailing list. Most problems in fonts with
> missing characters etc is due to ec encoding (I remember something in
> the past about \textmu not being present in ec). By ugly I meant that
> ConTeXt has to work harder behind the scenes to make sure that ec
> works.
>
oh, i thought that you meant the euro, which indeed is a pretty ugly
symbol not meant to blend with a properly designed font
> In any case, with luatex, TeX's font scene will be totally different
> (I know, I know, I should atleast try XeTeX)
>
Hans
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
