On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Maurice Diamantini wrote: > > Le 12 avr. 07 à 07:37, Thomas A. Schmitz a écrit : > >>> ... There are fast approaching competitors that >>> will eventually overtake LaTeX if we continue to stagnate. (Not to >>> mention ConTeXt, which has surpassed LaTeX in essentially every >>> area. Maybe the solution is just for everyone to switch to that.) > > Except for reference documentation or book (no need for a "s" here!).
While starting ConTeXt, I found ConTeXt an excrusion and ConTeXt manual to be extremely well written, much better than what I had read for LaTeX (but then, I never bought a LaTeX book). What do you find missing in the ConTeXt documentation that a book should cover? I know that there are certain places where the documentation is a bit old and outdated, but given the pace at which ConTeXt is developed, that will happen with any reference book. Aditya _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
