On Wed, 2 May 2007, John R. Culleton wrote: > The folks over at Scribus (a Quarkish Open Source page layout program) > are considering using some form of TeX for math typesetting. I > mentioned plain pdftex and Context as forms of TeX to be considered > as well as LaTeX. The question came up: how does Context comport > with AMS extensions? What should I say in reply?
ConTeXt supports about 95% of AMS features. The few that are not supported are because no one has really asked for them yet. I wrote an article "ConTeXt for AMS addicts" in the last issue of MAPS, which shows how to achieve different features of AMS in ConTeXt. Unforunately, 2006 issue of MAPS is not available online right now. If it will help convince others, I can send you a copy of the article. I can also post it on contextgarden, but I need to find out the copyright issue (hopefully it will not be a problem). Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
