Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Btw: Is there any reason for not using XeTeX (or LuaTeX in the future)
> for Chinese? (To be honest: I have absolutely no idea whether it works
> and how good it works if at all, but I would expect less problems
> there.)
i bet that duncan uses it in some workflow that has to be stable i.e. no
moving targets like xetex or luatex (yet)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
