Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
> Am 07.12.2007 um 10:06 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>
>> can you check the fonts being used? maybe older docs use ec and newer
>> texnansi and kerning as well as ligs may differ
>
>
> checking with acrobat the fonts actually used in the two pdfs gives both
> the same result, no change:
>
> NimbusRomNo9L-Medi (embedded Subset)
> Type: Type 1
> Encoding: Custom
> NimbusRomNo9L-Regu (embedded Subset)
> Type: Type 1
> Encoding: Custom
> NimbusRomNo9L-ReguItal (embedded Subset)
> Type: Type 1
> Encoding: Custom
> rtxmi (embedded Subset)
> Type: Type 1
> Encoding: Built-in
>
>
>
> nevertheless the two logs also have differences regarding fonts:
>
> with version 2007.08.09:
>
> fonts : using map file: lm-texnansi
> {/usr/local/texlive/2007/texmf-dist/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-texnansi.map}
> fonts : using map file: original-base
> {/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.
>
>
> map}
>
>
> now:
>
> fonts : using map file: original-base
> {/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.
>
>
> map}
>
>
>
> Any idea?
switch to ec encoding and see what happens ... in the past there were no
texnansi cmr files (only pseudo ec == aer)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
