Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

> Slow is no word for the speed with CJK, I have a document with Adobe
> Kozuka Minchi and Gothic and run takes up to 3 to 4 minutes.
> 
> The same document needs with XeTeX about half a minute and using the
> same fonts in plain TeX took only a few seconds.
> 
> This is really something LuaTeX need to be faster, but it is always faster
> than using the cwTeX in truetype format with pdfTeX ;-)

it all depends on what's done with the font ...

-- we can only locate a bottleneck when we have the font and a test file
-- when you're low on memory, the garbage collector of lua becomes a 
problem
-- dynamic features are faster (less loading)

3-4 minutes ... we use mk.tex as test doc, and that one loads cjk as 
well as zapfino and arab ... runtime on my machine is 15-20 sec, 
depending on the console used an din bachmode we go under 15 seconds 
(140 page document)

so, what kind of machine do you run luatex on?

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to