Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Slow is no word for the speed with CJK, I have a document with Adobe
> Kozuka Minchi and Gothic and run takes up to 3 to 4 minutes.
>
> The same document needs with XeTeX about half a minute and using the
> same fonts in plain TeX took only a few seconds.
>
> This is really something LuaTeX need to be faster, but it is always faster
> than using the cwTeX in truetype format with pdfTeX ;-)
it all depends on what's done with the font ...
-- we can only locate a bottleneck when we have the font and a test file
-- when you're low on memory, the garbage collector of lua becomes a
problem
-- dynamic features are faster (less loading)
3-4 minutes ... we use mk.tex as test doc, and that one loads cjk as
well as zapfino and arab ... runtime on my machine is 15-20 sec,
depending on the console used an din bachmode we go under 15 seconds
(140 page document)
so, what kind of machine do you run luatex on?
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________