Yue Wang wrote:
> thanks, mojca, but I think in the future new minimals should be
> carefully tested before commit to the server.
> at least 5 times the formats failed to compile this year which made
> the users run into problem using it.
> btw. the minimals works fine under FreeBSD using the Linux
> compatibility layer. but should we make binaries for BSD i386 and BSD
> amd64 as well?
> ps. until now only pdftex works in the minimals if we try to use the
> good old ways. the configuration files for dvipdfm(x) and dvips are
> almost missing. should we add it later? or just remove the dvi support
> completely?
the minimals are still experimental esp because we want to have
automated updates and such; it really takes (esp mojca) lots of time to
make sure that all files are there (and no redundant of unused files) as
well as to make sure that the scripts works ok
but we're getting there
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
