Hi,
I think I discovered a bug in the 'num' alternative of the bib module. It
seems to be incompatible with the prefix=+ option of referencing. The
following example gives an unknow reference:
% tex file
\usemodule[bib]
\setupbibtex[database=biblio]
\setuppublications[alternative=num]
\setuphead[chapter][prefix=+] % <<<< OK if commented
\starttext
\chapter[chap:one]{One} % <<<< OK if commented
Text \cite[test] text.
\completepublications
\stoptext
% bib file biblio.bib
@BOOK{test,
title = {T},
publisher = {P},
year = {Y},
author = {A}
}
By the way, the 'num' alternative also gives an unknow reference when
\completepublications is not present, while the default alternative is OK. Is
there a particular reason for this? Thanks.
Greetings,
Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________