as far as i am concerned, MKIV is far better than MKII/pdftex, and have less bugs concerning the internationalization. I use it for production purpose. I typeset all my essays using luatex, because pdftex/MKII is messy especially on non-latin typesetting. Yes, LuaTeX/MKIV had bugs, but Taco and Hans can solve them:) again. MKII+XeTeX should also produce the right pdf. but I didn't try. (XeTeX is stable for production, uh?)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > > Am 22.04.2008 um 15:50 schrieb Yue Wang: > > > >> Use LuaTeX+MKIV.. > > > > > > well, sure ... LuaTeX is certainly on my todolist, only not at the end > > of an almost finished project. > > > > I assume LuaTeX is not yet mature enough for real production needs as > > MKII is, right? Taco? > > No, I do not think that would be wise. Certainly not for a project that > is nearly finished. > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to > the Wiki! > > maillist : [email protected] / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
