Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> I don't know how the section number (with/without previous number) is
> build internally, but I hope there could be a hack, with ...
>
> setupsection[...][previousnumber=yes]% so that referencing gets the
> full path
>
> .... but a section-design like "previousnumber=no", made with ...
>
> \setuphead[...][command=\PreviousNumberNo]
>
>
> Could this be done?
the current mechanisms are a messy compromise of old tex, newer tex
(etex) and history ... lists, references and sectioning will be
rewritten (and more flexible) for mkiv
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
