> Indeed. Question to the developers: given that our rule of thumb is
> "material within {} will be typeset; material within [] is for setups
> etc.," wouldn't it make sense to have the command as index[]? (Maybe
> with an alternative \index{} which will typeset the word AND put it in
> the index?)
Ok, but what am I doing wrong? Should I typeset \index[] or \index{}?
Or am I missing some trick? Or is this problem waiting for solution.
I have put both ways in my file and the page with Index is still empty.
Armando Martins
Citando "Thomas A. Schmitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>
>>> \index[Tantrum]Tantrums can be normal for
>>
>> \index{Tantrum}
>
> Indeed. Question to the developers: given that our rule of thumb is
> "material within {} will be typeset; material within [] is for setups
> etc.," wouldn't it make sense to have the command as index[]? (Maybe
> with an alternative \index{} which will typeset the word AND put it in
> the index?)
>
> Thomas
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
