On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>>>> (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
>>>
>>>
>>> char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we  
>>> need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as   
>>> basemark but ...
>>
>> Actually, 1617 (shadda) and 1615 (fatha) will form a shadda-fatha
>> ligature, thus there is no proper mkmk anchors between both. 
>
> hm, they won't because 1615 becomes an initial and therefore an other  
> character

I'm not sure if I understand this, do marks have initial and other
forms?

>
> also, i wonder if this is ok:
>
>     ["char"]="shaddaKasra",
>     ["components"]="shadda fatha",

The ligature is OK, just the name is wrong (I named it wrongly while
asleep or something).


>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
 Khaled Hosny
 Arabic localizer and member of Arabeyes.org team

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to