On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: > Khaled Hosny wrote: >> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> Khaled Hosny wrote: >>>> (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow) >>> >>> >>> char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we >>> need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as >>> basemark but ... >> >> Actually, 1617 (shadda) and 1615 (fatha) will form a shadda-fatha >> ligature, thus there is no proper mkmk anchors between both. > > hm, they won't because 1615 becomes an initial and therefore an other > character
I'm not sure if I understand this, do marks have initial and other forms? > > also, i wonder if this is ok: > > ["char"]="shaddaKasra", > ["components"]="shadda fatha", The ligature is OK, just the name is wrong (I named it wrongly while asleep or something). > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com > | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localizer and member of Arabeyes.org team
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________