Hi Charles, On Sat, 31 May 2008 11:26:50 -0600, Charles P. Schaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would say that TeX is a way in which a mathematician / theoretical > computer scientist that is well-steeped in music, languages, art, > literature, and other areas might approach the issue. InDesign is the > way in which a large number in the design community might approach the > issue. Thank you for your very detailed comments. I would like to this and the other comments in the "How could a typesetting system be today?" thread summarized into a wiki page or even an article. I don't have InDesign so I can't test these things directly, but I'd like to cooperate with folks here like Charles, Yue, luigi, Henneng and others to create a complete and precise comparison contrast between InDesign and luaTeX, with a view towards future development challenges. Best wishes Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid, Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Shi`i Studies Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
