Hi Renaud, Renaud Aubin wrote: > Hi Folks ! > > I'm currently writting a technical report in which I need to type some > XML an non-XML text. > > Sample file (xml_test.tex): > I have some custom XML text (trivial) + a not-so-complicated xsl > transformation (a part is included within the test file). I know there > is verb-xml but... I need to improve it to support xpath expr. More > over, I want to preserve the initial indentation. The point is now, how > to improve verb-xml to support xpath expressions ? I'm working with Mark > II... Should I switch to Mark IV if I want to write a new XML verbatim > support (with lua)? > > + the bonus question: I want to add some support for the RelaxNG Compact > syntax, should I follow the procedure described on the wiki or switch to > Mark IV ? > > The deadline for this technical report: end of october...
Mark IV's framework for syntax highlighting is definately easier to use if you are somewhat familiar with 'normal' scripting languages (as opposed to TeX). But 'end of october' is pretty close, so I would suggest using t-vim, maybe with some postprocessing. http://modules.contextgarden.net/vim Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
