On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:14:17PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > Khaled Hosny wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:48:36PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> Khaled Hosny wrote: >>>> Marks don't get positioned correctly unless all marks are supplied, if >>>> one mark is omitted, the next mark will be positioned at the first >>>> anchor point, not in the second one etc, in some cases it'll even not >>>> positioned on the anchor point at all. >>>> >>>> In the attached sample, the first word in the line is correct, >>>> subsequent ones aren't. >>>> (The font used: >>>> http://raqm.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/fonts/simplenaskhi/SimpleNaskhi.ttf) >>> can you check the new beta? >> >> It is fixed in the beta, thanks. >> >> Now I found another bug, when having two marks on the same base glyph, >> the first one is positioned correctly but not the second one. >> See the attached sample (I swapped the marks on the next word). > > another attempt ..
That one is fixed too, thanks. (Time to find another bug :) ) > can you coordinate your tests with idris (he collects test snippets so > that eventually we have some kind of regression test) I uploaded the files in the svn repository with font: http://code.google.com/p/raqm/source/browse/#svn/trunk/fonts/simplenaskhi/tests Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
