Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past?
repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization)
"~", by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; example:

\starttext
$3\times 10^{-9}~\text{m}$

$3\times 10^{-9}\,\text{m}$
\stoptext
no surprise, as math has its own spacing model so it all depends on the
definitions; i'm not even sure if we shoule support an active ~ in math
mode at all

I do not have any strong feelings about this, but do believe that "~" has always provided an unbreakable white space in TeX, both in text and math mode. I also feel that "~" is more readable than "\,".

The activeness of ~ isn't that important, but there really should be
a non-breakable space in math mode, and an active ~ is the most logical
choice because of 20 years of TeX input. You can pick something else,
but it is definately needed, and it should be shorter than
  "\penalty10000 \ "

hm, currently ~ is

\penalty \plustenthousand\space

which gives no space in math as spaces are ignored

i have this definition probably for a reason so i tend to be careful with a change in text mode

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to