On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >>> and has no influence in mkiv. (The >>> workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no >>> difference.) > > in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional > vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but > symbols is a 'whole font' issue
I agree ... there are lots of other symbols. I noticed the "tex-bi" in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably exactly the same as "math-bi". Do you plan to misuse "tex-bi" or to to define mathematics.make_font ( "lmroman10-boldmath" ... ) for bold math then? Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
