Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:21:48 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote:
>
>> Am Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:05:07 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin Scholz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi List,
>>>>
>>>> does anybody of you know if there is context package/module that
>>>> provides the usability of AMS symbols like \subsetneq or \subsetneqq?
>>>
>>> MkII or MkIV?
>> MkII
>>>
>>>> or is the only way to define every symbol by hand manually in the
>>>> form of
>>>>
>>>> \mathchardef\subsetneq=####
>>>
>>> Just send a list of symbols that are missing, and we will add them to
>>> the core.
>>>
>>> Aditya
>>>
>> Just answered Hans with the part that missed in my opinion. but if it
>> is there, I don't know what I'm doing wrong...
>
> I don't know. The following works fine here with the current minimals.
>
> \starttext
> $\subsetneqq\subsetneq\supsetneqq\supsetneq$ \stoptext
>
> It also works correctly on contextgarden (live.contextgarden.net). To be
> explicit, you can try to force the ams definitions:
>
> \definetypeface[mainface][rm][serif][modern][default][encoding=
\defaultencoding]
> \definetypeface[mainface][ss][sans]
> [modern][default][encoding=\defaultencoding]
> \definetypeface[mainface][tt][mono]
> [modern][default][encoding=\defaultencoding]
> \definetypeface[mainface][mm][mant] [modern][ams]
> [encoding=\defaultencoding]
>
> \setupbodyfont[mainface]
>
Ok I found out where the problem is and why I need to define the folowing
symbols manually like this:
\font\msbmx=msbm10 at 10pt
\textfont15=\msbmx
\mathchardef\subsetneqq="3F24
\mathchardef\subsetneq="3F28
\mathchardef\supsetneqq="3F25
\mathchardef\supsetneq="3F29
I'm using the following setup:
\definetypeface[modern][mm][math][modern][ams][endocing=\defaultencoding]
because in this connection the following part produces the nicer output,
or it there a way to the the dstroke environment behave like in the math
under mant?
\definefamilysynonym[default][doublestroke][mb]
\def\dstroke {\fam\purefamily {doublestroke}}
here the Symbol for natural Numbers is produced like ||\|
and not like |\\|
hope the ascii-Art is readable...
Greetings Martin
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
