On Wednesday 25 November 2009 08:15:48 luigi scarso wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz > > <thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > > Just an afterthought to this problem: I discovered yesterday that the > > same file behaved quite differently in different viewers. It was a file > > compiled with the latest beta under linux, luatex 0.44, and with my own > > fonts. > > > > 1. In evince under linux, the file looked fine, no problems were > > apparent. > > what about xpdf and ghostscript? > Can you also try with mupdf ? >
Maybe unrelated, but maybe a luatex error as well: transparency seems to work correctly when viewed with okular (same library as evince) but not when view with acroread, (including the windows version). Alan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
