On Nov 27, 2009, at 17;29,08 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 18:40, Bowen Alan C. wrote: >> On Nov 27, 2009, at 10;17,36 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>>> Bowen Alan C. wrote: >>>>> I have successfully installed and run this latest ConTeXt (in the >>>>> minimals). >>>>> >>>>> What has happened to context --version and luatex --version? >>>>> >>>>> Both now get “command not found”. >>>> >>>> IIRC, mojca changed setuptex so that it only adjusts the PATH in the >>>> current subshell. Can that be the problem? >>> >>> Hard to believe (though anything is possible). >>> >>> My crystal ball says that Alan uses Mac OS X Snow Leopard with 32-bit >>> kernel. >>> >>> Alan, please: >>> - fetch the latest first-setup.sh or set platform=osx-64 manually >>> before calling mtxrun >>> - you might need to remove --make from mtxrun and run mktexlsr/texexec >>> --make manually until further notice (I need to fix some minor bug, >>> sorry) >>> >>> Mojca >> >> Hi, Mojca— >> >> You have a great crystal ball! I have set my platform to 64-bit kernel >> startup mode, re-started, and re-installed the latest from the minimals >> using ./firstsetup.sh >> >> Still no recognition of context --version and luatex --version. >> As for your other suggestions, I get “command not found” for mtxrun, >> texmfstart, texexec, mtexlsr. >> >> As you can probably also see in your crystal ball, I am at the limits of my >> knowledge of unix and how ConTeXt, luatex are installed. So while I am >> happy to test what you say and provide feedback, please don’t get trapped >> into dealing with me about a problem that will eventually go away anyway. >> (My installation does still work, after all-- well, except for some >> unresolved problems with multi-page tables, but that is another thread.) > > 1. Check if you have either executed "source setuptex" (. setuptex) or > set the path explicitely > 2. Please check the contents of "/path/to/your/context/tex" by typing > ls /path/to/your/context/tex > ls /path/to/your/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin > 3. What does > echo $PATH > say (after making sure that . setuptex is executed)? > > Mojca
Mojca— 1. When I open Terminal, I always see the line Setting "/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex" as ConTeXt root. so I take it that .setuptex has been executed 2. ls /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex gets: mysetuptex setuptex.bat setuptex.tmf texmf-cache texmf-local texmf-project setuptex setuptex.csh texmf texmf-context texmf-osx-intel 3. echo $PATH gets: /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin Alan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
