On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:54:47 +0100 "Manuel P." <ayeye.sysfo...@gmail.com> scribit:
> ConTeXt is a good software. I was impressed with a manual typesetted [...] I also > > ConTeXt is beautiful because it's very configurable, [...] Yes > > I've had some unpleasant surprises: > - Bibliography doesn't work the way it should It is not a good idea to use no-languages (TeX, LaTeX & friends) for bibliography. Write the biblio and your source text in your own format and use a true language (Python, C, Pascal, Python, ...) to translate the brute source (with refs) and the biblio base to a typesetter code (TeX or ConText). The last days I had to edit Python-listings (my scores). \starttyping ... \stoptyping. Fine! but there are no headers. But I need headers. Not easy to understand \setupheads, \setupheaders \setupheader etc. there are no examples given. I re-tried reSt, asciidoc : ugly like Latex. So I wrote a Python-script which reads the Python-score and writes a plain tex file (merci Raymond Seroul et le "Petit livre de TeX" ;-). Nevertheless, ConText beeing the best choice, I am volunteer to help for _french_ (and german) wiki pages in the contextgarden. [...] > > -- > Manuel P. > -- René Bastian www.pythoneon.org www.musiques-rb.org ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
