Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Taco,the following example (I need to admit that I'm not sure how to properly cite inproceedings) returns a different result in mkii and mkiv. My citation (the fields I use) is probably a bit wrong, but the results should be the same in my opinion. (Only mkii shows the year, in mkiv there's an extra space; the month is not shown anywhere,
Please try the attached patched version of bibl-num.tex, that should give you the month back in mkii. (if it works, similar patches are needed to the other files, of course).
pubname is only shown in mkii although it's probably not needed anyway since it's already the title (= booktitle in bibtex?) that takes that role. It's also not really clear to me why I need to use author and not artauthor, but well ...)
In hindsight, artauthor would have been better, but it would be a bad idea to change that after all that time.
It may be sensible to have some reference about which fields are sensible for what type of publication also among the ConTeXt manuals.
Well, for mkii I was aiming for the same fields as for bibtex, (plus/minus the [art]author/[art]title differences). It just so happens that I missed 'month' and perhaps others as well. Best wishes, Taco
bibl-num.tex
Description: TeX document
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
