Am 2010-09-08 um 20:48 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
For some time already I'm considering moving the imposition
variants to
(autoloaded) modules.
pimp-* or so
That name might be unfortunate :-)
But imp isn't better.
German "Ausschießen" tends to Freudian typos ;-)
I'd suggest to outsource all the imposition schemes to one module (and
that could grow at will), m-imposition perhaps (or t-impostor?).
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
