Dne petek 8. oktobra 2010 ob 20:36:35 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a): > * because it is not free software according to the Debian guidelines; > * because it is a binary update;
At a first (and second) glance, I don't feel exactly comfortable with these two. Would you care to explain them a bit more? Does "not free according to Debian" mean that it *is* free according to FSF and/or OSI? Binary updates as in closed source or as in e.g. pictures? Cheers, Matija -- gsm: +386 41 849 552 www: http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
