> I'm pretty sure that I never implemented something using a questionmark.
> However, we do have:
>
> \definecolor[red-t] [r=1,t=0.5,a=1]
> \definecolor[green-t][g=1,t=0.5,a=1]
> \defineintermediatecolor[mycolora][0.5,red,green]
> \defineintermediatecolor[mycolorb][0.5,red-t,green-t]
>
> \starttext
> test {\mycolora OEPS} test
> test {\mycolorb OEPS} test
> \stoptext
>
> I could probably support
>
> \definecolor[xxx][0.5(red,green)]
> \definecolor[xxx][0.5(red)]
>
> which looks better than this ! and is less likely to conflict with names
> as abc! is a rather value color name.
OK, thanks. Last question then: is there a way to redefine standard
colors? Something like:
\redefinecolor[red][r=0,g=1,b=0]
--
Michael Murphy
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
