On 2010-12-18 <20:58:01>, Philipp A. wrote:
> hi,
> do you really support this obsolete statement?
> 
> if so: why?
> 
>    - html mail is supported by every mail reader nowadays, and nowhere near
>    broken
>    - semantic html is way better for blind people than plain text, since it
>    is, well, semantically structured. something enclosed in em-tags will e.g.
>    pronounced in a accentuated voice by the screen reader.
>    - e mail sizes are no problem with today's hd capacity
>    - every proper mail reader does block pics from foreign sources for
>    privacy reasons
> 
> essentially: this was true, and isn't anymore.
> 
> if you think http://www.xkcd.com/386 , you are right, i'm like that :)



I refuse to discuss this matter outside a pub.



> 
> cu in the context forum,
> philipp

> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________


-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

Attachment: pgp1QUoY3cCQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to