Am Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:46:26 +0100 schrieb Martin Schröder:
>> from what I understand WinEdt kind-of-works with Unicode (as long as >> all the characters belong to a single codepade, it is able to save and >> read the file as UTF-8). > It's 2010, not 1995. Forget about editors that don't do Unicode. > Especially if they cost money. Even in 2010 I'm still writing only texts which need the characters from the ansinew codepage. I don't know any language which use a different script. In the few cases I had to insert a greek word in a text I could use ^^-notation or \char/symbol or a transscription. So why should I care if an editor can handle chinese or arabic? Should I really invest a lot of time to get used to another editor only because it has features I will probably never need? -- Ulrike Fischer ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
