On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear Aditya, dear Hans,
I noticed a serious difference between what one gets for \left\Vert in mkii and
in mkiv.
Probably this is due to the fact that in mkiv the glyph for \Vert is
constructed in a different manner, but as far as I know from what I see in the
mathematical printed materials, the correct one, or the expected one, is the
output from mkii.
I don't know why the glyphs are different. In MkIV, the virtual font is
mapping 0x2016 to 0xFF605, but I don't know how FF605 is created.
Is there a way to redefine locally \Vert (or \|) so that in mkiv one gets the
same output as with mkii?
Not locally. You could change math-vfu.lua to change the mapping, but I
don't completely understand how those work (with the virtual glyphs like
FF605)
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
