Hello, I encountered a bit strange effects when using footnotes in the area which is formed by a floating object.
Consider the following example:
---
\setupinteraction[state=start]
% Heads
\setupheads[aligntitle=float]
% Graphics
\startreusableMPgraphic{Dgm}
draw (0,8cm)--(0,0)--(5cm,0)--cycle;
\stopreusableMPgraphic
% Body
\starttext
\subject{AAA\footnote{aaa}}
\input tufte
\blank\placefigure[left,none]{}{\framed[frame=on,offset=6pt]{\reuseMPgraphic{Dgm}}}
\subject{BBB}
TTT\footnote{ttt}
\subject{CCC\footnote{ccc}}
\input tufte
\stoptext
---
Three "types" of footnotes appear in the bottom of the page:
1) black, non-interactive (refers to the same page as the footnote is defined),
2) coloured, interactive (although it refers to the same page as the footnote
is defined),
- the footnote mark (in place of footnote definition) is also coloured and
interactive and refers to the bottom (of the same page),
- the coloured footnote number ("2") seems to me a bit thicker than if it were
"normal" (i.e. black, non-interactive),
3) black, interactive (although it refers to the same page as the footnote is
defined).
IMHO, all three cases the footnotes should have the same colour and
"interactivity".
- The effect is not serious, but it may be something "to be thought about".
Best regards,
Lukas
--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:l...@pontex.cz]
Pontex s. r. o. [mailto:pon...@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz]
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4
Tel: +420 244 062 238
Fax: +420 244 461 038
t-Hang2.mkiv
Description: Binary data
t-Hang2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
