On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
`\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally?
I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I think that
the intent of amstex is that the user should use \dotsb for dots between
binary operators and then change \dotsb to \cdots or \ldots depending on
convention. If so, we need to add them to \setupmathematics or perhaps add
a new command
\setupmathdots[binary=middle,comma=low,...and others...]
or something similar.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
