On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 15:06, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear ConTeXt folks,
>
> using
>
> ConTeXt ver: 2011.05.18 22:26 MKIV fmt: 2011.5.27 int: english/english
>
> the following example produces different integral signs.
>
> --- minimal example ---
> \starttext
> Using the NEO keyboard layout several math symbols can be inserted directly
> like $∫$ or $∩$.
>
> But $\int$ and $∫$ look differently.
> \stoptext
> --- minimal example ---
However the character ∫ looks the same as \intop and ∫\nolimits looks
the same as \int.
As to why \intop looks so weird, I have no idea. If you add
\usetypescript[modern-base] \setupbodyfont[modern]
it will work ok. Cambria Math also results in two different heights of
the operator depending on whether limits are there or not. It might be
a bug somewhere in virtual font setup of LM. In pdfTeX \int and \intop
operators are positioned equally.
Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
