Dnia 2011-07-30, o godz. 23:01:01
Mojca Miklavec <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 22:27, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> >
> > Am 27.07.2011 um 16:03 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
> >
> >> As in the topic.
> >>
> >> For example, \setupbodyfont[antykwa-poltawskiego] works without
> >> \usetypescript, but \setupbodyfont[antykwa] not.  Why is that so?
> >
> > You can omit \setupbodyfont when the typescript and the typeface
> > have the same name which is the case for “Antykwa Poltawskiego” but
> > for “Antykwa Torunska” both names are different.
> 
> Isn't Antyqwa Torunska just about the only font with that propertly?
> 
> Hans - would it be possible to make a synonym, so that
>     \setupbodyfont[antyqwa-torunska]
> would work out of the box, like it does for all other fonts?

I'm all for it!!!

Just one minor thing: it's AntyKwa, not AntyQwa:).

And I didn't notice anything wrong with headers when not using
\usetypescript, by the way.

> Thank you,
>    Mojca

TIA

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to