On 22-8-2011 09:15, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi
Consider the following example:
\startluacode
print("lualetterbackslash:", [=[\\include]=])
\stopluacode
\def\lualetterbackslash{\letterbackslash}
\startluacode
print("letterbackslash:", [=[\\include]=])
\stopluacode
\bye
gives
lualetterbackslash: \\include
letterbackslash: \include
I find the second alternative better. Why is \lualetterbackslash defined
differently from \letterbackslash?
to avoid problems with \n, \t and such
btw, best use context.include then as it provides you better tracing
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
