On 2011-10-18 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> […]
>
> To be sure I looked for the correct input and also MkII expects
> the + and - before the location of the node but MkII had “n” as
> synonym for + which is now “m” in MkIV.
I see. Thanks for checking the sources. That means the
syntax is as follows:
-t t +t
----------------
+l | | +r
| |
l | | r
| |
-l | | -r
| |
----------------
-b b +b
I added a section to the wiki.
Marco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
