Another possibility would be to interpose the Lua-code somwhere in between the
processing stream. The \directlua-call can get its input from \xmlstripped and
then does a tex.print back to ConTeXt. Or is there a more direct way to
substitute the manipulated string for the original input?
Hans van der Meer
On 2 jan. 2012, at 20:04, Meer, H. van der wrote:
> The macro \xmlstripped{node}{lpath} gives me the xml resulting from the
> strip. after some operations on this result I would like to reprocess this in
> order to typeset.
> How do I accomplish this?
>
> Hans van der Meer
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
