On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Meer, H. van der <h.vanderm...@uva.nl>wrote:
> > > On 11 jan. 2012, at 11:33, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Hans van der Meer <havdm...@xs4all.nl>wrote: > >> Something must have been changed with buffers between the versions: >> ConTeXt ver: 2011.11.29 18:47 MKIV fmt: 2011.12.31 >> and >> ConTeXt ver: 2012.01.09 10:08 MKIV fmt: 2012.1.11 >> >> Formerly this was ok: >> \startbuffer[abc] >> whatever >> \stopbuffer >> >> Now I get: ! Missing } inserted. >> >> Because running this in isolation goes without a problem, I suspect the >> change has to do with the project structure in which I use the buffer. But >> again, it worked in the past. >> > Does it works with > \setbuffer[abc] > whatever > \endbuffer > ? > > > It works with these macros, yes. Thanks. > > But is \setbuffer..\endbuffer something new? I do not see it on the > Reference page of the wiki. Also it doesn't seem in line with ConTeXt's > regular naming scheme of \startsomething..\stopsomething. > Can you give somewhat more information, for examle what is the difference > between \setbuffer and \startbuffer? > > > Hans van der Meer > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to > the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > Well, start/stopbuffer should work... and Hans said that it will be fixed in the next beta. The problems seems to be a missing \endgroup \setuvalue{\e!start\v!buffer}% {\bgroup \obeylines \dosingleempty\buff_start} \def\buff_start[#1]% {\buff_start_indeed{}{#1}{\e!start\v!buffer}{\e!stop\v!buffer}} \def\buff_start_indeed#1#2#3#4% \donothing needed ! {\normalexpanded{\buff_pickup{#2}{#3}{#4}{}{\buff_stop{#4}}}} Perhaps it should be \def\buff_start[#1]% {\buff_start_indeed{}{#1}{\e!start\v!buffer}{\e!stop\v!buffer}\egroup} -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
