On 17-1-2012 16:28, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I didn't follow development of ConTeXt too closely, but I'm lead to
believe that \active has disappeared from ConTeXt MKIV. Others will
have to correct me if I'm wrong - I didn't check ConTeXt sources. And
others will have to make suggestion about what to do about this.
Patching might as easy as adding \def\active{13} somewhere on top of
TikZ sources, but it might help to understand why Hans decided to
remove the \active command if that is true.
It's one of those traditional plain tex commands, but it's also one of
those commands that is sensitive for being redefined by a user; another
one is \letter (a command one could imagine to be used in the letter
module). Maybe some more will go in the process of cleaning up.
The longer internal names already are around for a while.
I'll add an \active definition to cont-new.tex for a while
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
