On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:41 +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > That's weird. It is probably a bug in Hans' reimplementation of the > bib module for mkiv.
I've cc'd Hans in case he has something to offer on that.
> But it is fairly simple to work around, using a
> new macro definition like this:
>
> \unexpanded\def\mycite{\dodoubleempty\domycite}
> \def\domycite[#1][#2]%
> {\ifsecondargument
> \footnote{\cite[alternative=data,#1][#2]}%
> \else
> \footnote{\cite[data][#1]}%
> \fi}
>
> Then \mycite[<key>] also inserts the \footnote command automatically,
> and you can still use \mycite[extras={...}][<key>].
That works awesome Taco. Thanks a lot. It doesn't matter that it can't
accept multiple keys easily and put on their own lines, since it
wouldn't make sense if you've got extra={} data to add anyways.
> Perhaps, but I have never seen it done like that, and it takes more
> than a bit of programming to make the bibliography module do that.
> Sorry, no time for that.
It's ok. You've done more than enough.
> No, you can't do that. Hans would have to write an extension for
> that, I do not even know where to start.
Understandable.
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
