On 22-8-2012 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.08.2012 um 13:15 schrieb Procházka Lukáš <l...@pontex.cz>:
Hello,
sometimes in this mail discussion I'm encountering a Ctx/Lua command which has
been unknown for me or I would use other (known) commands to do the job.
So - would it be possible to explain
- what's the difference/advantage btw \directlua and \ctxlua
No difference, just another name, there are even more synonyms.
The \ctxlua variant is somewhat more future proof. In the past
\directlua had a mandate extra argument. Also, the \ctxlua macro
can use a dedicated message namespace if needed and future versions
might have more tracing.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
