On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:58:11PM +0200, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
Not quite sure if this is the right place. I wanted to send this
directly to Khaled Hosny, but then I thought it might be good to have
some additional opinion on some of these issues (I am not quite sure
if some of this is intended behaviour).
I have collected some examples for which I think there are some
scaling and spacing problems in xits.
Also, small caps are not supported. Is this intended?!
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Andreas
%%%%%%%%%%%% MINIMAL EXAMPLE %%%%%%%%%%%%
\setupbodyfont[xits,11pt]
\starttext
$\diamond$ % too small?!
$\square$ % OK?!
$\blacktriangleright$ % too big?!
$\blacktriangleleft$ % too big?!
$\blacktriangle$ % too big?!
$\blacktriangledown$ % too big?!
None of those glyphs were changed in XITS, they are exactly the same as
the ones in STIX fonts, so possibly ConTeXt is using the wrong Unicode
character for those symbols. The later two are smaller with LaTeX
package unicode-math.
That is most likely the issue. I never really understood what all these
triangles should map to. Should we target unicode-math the reference
implmentation?
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
